How to Maintain Client Experience and Retain Staff When Selling to an Outside Buyer

A practical roadmap for readiness, people, and a smooth client transition Selling a financial planning practice is not just a transaction. It is a change event that touches clients, staff, regulators, technology, and your own identity as the founder. The advisors who feel best about their outcome tend to do two things well: Prepare the business like an acquirer will run it tomorrow. Communicate the transition in a way that protects trust and continuity. Why “seller readiness” is the real deal leverage Many owners think “getting ready to sell” starts when a buyer is identified. In practice, it starts much earlier, because early preparation gives you options: tax planning, negotiation leverage, cleaner due diligence, and a calmer client transition. SRG’s dissolution guidance recommends beginning 12 to 24 months before close to allow time for tax optimization, buyer negotiation, and client transition planning without rushing. A simple readiness checklist that buyers actually care about Before you name a price or talk terms, start by getting your house in order. SRG’s Seller Readiness eBook highlights several practical pre-sale actions: Verify and document internal processes. Shift as much revenue as possible toward recurring sources. Reduce overhead and eliminate long-term obligations where possible. Create documentation and manuals for core workflows. Assemble your M&A team early. One more important point: avoid casually floating the idea of selling around your network. When you are ready, leverage a structured process and an advocate who can screen candidates thoroughly. That matters because you only sell this business once. Your timeline and process should be built to protect clients and reduce the risk of a rushed decision.   The transition plan is not optional Even in a strong market, sellers can underestimate the work required after the deal terms are signed. A transition plan is how you protect enterprise value after closing, because retention is where the economics are either earned or given back. A typical relationship transition often spans 6 to 18 months and can require hundreds of hours of transition-related support time. That benchmark is a useful anchor because it signals realism. Selling is not an event. It is a structured handoff.   Your staff can make the deal easier or harder If clients are the revenue engine, staff are the continuity engine. They hold systems, workflows, relationships, and culture. That is why employee communication is one of the most sensitive parts of the process, with real implications for morale, reputation, and legal risk.   When to tell the team In many deals, you need staff involved before a transaction is complete because due diligence requires data gathering, reporting, and operational support. At the same time, timing matters. Tell staff too early and you can create uncertainty. Tell them too late and you can fuel rumors. Clear, definitive messaging reassures employees and helps retain top talent.   How to tell the team A strong best practice is to communicate face-to-face first. Avoid using email, phone calls, instant messaging, or text for the first conversation. A helpful structure is: Individual conversations first, so people can react privately Then a group discussion to reinforce consistent messaging and create a forum for questions   What to say so you keep people You do not need a perfect script, but you do need clarity. Cover: why you are selling what the sale means for them what is likely to stay the same (location, roles, compensation and benefits, service model, workflows) the expected timeline (due diligence, close, what happens after) Also consider retention bonuses for key employees and incentives for the added workload your team takes on during due diligence. Lack of buy-in can create friction for buyers and the deal.   Client communication: protect trust with sequencing and clarity Clients do not need every detail. They need confidence, continuity, and a clear plan. Effective communication maintains trust and continuity, reinforces what will remain the same (services, relationships, points of contact), and outlines next steps and timeline.   Plan first, then execute Communication planning is a phase, not an afterthought. Key pre-work often includes: identifying stakeholders developing a notification timeline drafting the client letter with buyer collaboration preparing transition paperwork building call scripts and meeting plans Be mindful when sharing client-specific information. Only disclose what is necessary for service delivery or compliance purposes, and protect sensitive data throughout the process.   Sequence communication to reduce confusion A practical sequence is: regulators custodians clients This sequencing helps ensure you are prepared to support the transition when clients hear the news.   Timing expectations that reduce surprises Written notice typically goes out immediately after close, and should not be delayed. For key relationships, plan to call priority clients, schedule introductory meetings with the seller and buyer, and then provide transition paperwork.   Operational continuity: the unglamorous details that keep clients calm A transition can fail because of small operational mistakes that create friction for clients. Office and system updates matter, such as: redirecting phones and emails forwarding websites and ensuring portals work updating access controls and permissions keeping workflows stable during the handoff One important caution: implementing changes too early can create privacy issues, confuse clients, and create costly reversals if the sale does not close.   Compliance and wind-down: avoid avoidable risk after a sale A sale does not eliminate your obligations overnight. Recordkeeping, data security, and regulatory procedures still matter after close. Maintain records for the required statutory period and secure client data appropriately. Also remember that regulatory filings do not automatically dissolve the underlying business entity, and filing too early can create problems during the account transition.   Your stakeholders matter, but they need to be used at the right time Sellers should not do this alone. The right stakeholders improve outcomes and reduce risk, including: staff legal counsel tax and accounting professionals trusted partners who can provide perspective an experienced advocate to manage the process and screen buyers When used correctly, the people around you do not create noise. They create clarity.   Conclusion: sell with clarity, not urgency

Larger firms, rising multiples: Is this the new standard for advisor M&A?

By: Steve RandallPublishing Date: February 9, 2026 The M&A landscape for financial advisory practices is heating up, with 2025 emerging as a year of larger deals, richer valuation multiples and more complex terms. According to the latest industry benchmarking report from Succession Resource Group, drawn from 171 completed transactions totaling more than $14 billion in assets under management, there’s a clear shift away from small, relatively simple handoffs to deals marked by deeper capital structures, advanced financing and a heavier presence of institutional buyers. Among the most notable trends in 2025 was a meaningful uptick in multiples paid for recurring revenue and profitability. Transactions valued on an EBITDA basis averaged 9.98x business earnings, while recurring revenue books commanded an average of 3.27x. This increase continued a pattern of expanding valuations seen the prior year, reflecting strong buyer confidence despite broader macroeconomic uncertainty. One quarter of deals paid above 3.5x recurring revenue, with more than one in five surpassing 4.0x, a sign that strategic acquirers are willing to pay premiums for quality revenue streams. Third-party financing also played a larger role in closing deals, rising to 56 % of transactions as interest rates steadied and lenders grew comfortable extending leverage. In many cases, bank and broker-dealer financing now supports up to 70-80% of purchase prices, with sellers taking back notes on the balance. SRG’s data shows a pronounced decline in deals involving buyers from outside the seller’s home state, dropping to 24.8 % from a prior peak. At the same time, the buyer base has become more concentrated around experienced acquirers, reducing the ratio of buyers to sellers and suggesting more competitive processes. SRG’s President David Grau Jr. attributed rising valuations to the caliber of practices on offer and the financial discipline of buyers. “The valuations paid today are higher than they’ve ever been before, but the same core fundamentals still apply – the deals have to cash flow.,” he said. “Sellers can get a higher value than we’ve ever seen, but it is paid for large (multi-billion-dollar RIAs), well-run firms, and the value is paid ‘on terms’ meaning most of that value is contingent.” Who’s buying? Internal equity transactions, where succession occurs via sales to existing partners, expanded to 32% of all deals, reflecting a maturing succession planning ecosystem within advisory businesses. At the same time, nearly half of firms making internal transitions brought in outside capital to support equity buys by next-generation leadership teams. SRG also observed that earn-outs are increasingly used to bridge valuation expectations and share risk between buyers and sellers. Large private equity groups and aggregator platforms continued to invest aggressively, often structuring deals with smaller initial cash downs and significant future equity or earn-outs. These flexible structures are enabling sellers to access above-market valuations while remaining tied to growth outcomes. The SRG team forecasts continued expansion of M&A activity in 2026, albeit with a focus on larger, well-capitalized buyers and fewer but higher-value deals. Creative deal terms, innovative financing and a continued premium on firms with robust financial performance are expected to shape the market. “Founders who focus on building a sustainable firm, optimizing their business, and remaining focused on the best fit for their clients at their exit will always get the best value. Period,” concluded Grau Jr. To read the full article, please visit: https://www.investmentnews.com/ria-news/larger-firms-rising-multiples-is-this-the-new-standard-for-advisor-ma/265188  Disclaimer This article was first published by Steve Randall. The original article can be found here. All rights to the original content are held by InvestmentNews.

How Firms Use Equity Stakes to Retain Top Advisor Talent, Drive M&A

By: Tobias SalingerPublishing Date: January 27, 2026 Internal transactions in which financial advisors buy equity in their firms represent a growing share of wealth management M&A deals, a new study found. Those deals boost advisors’ compensation via stakes in expanding firms, making them more likely to stay long-term. And they’re becoming more popular, according to a webinar last week held by consulting firm Succession Resource Group on its annual M&A study and hosted by founder and CEO David Grau and Parker Finot, its director of transaction advisory services. The study analyzed data from 171 transactions in 2025, including firms with about $14 billion in total client assets that Succession Resource advised, as well as other deals that used financing from Oak Street Funding and PPC Loan, which both collaborated in the study. Across M&A deals, a small group of highly competitive buyers continues to drive record valuations, leading to new highs in transaction volume. The number of potential acquirers per seller plummeted last year to 61 from 85 in 2023 and from 66 in 2024.  Grau noted four main M&A trends from 2025: private equity investors’ impact on deal sizes, overall higher valuations, a smaller pool of possible buyers and a rising number of internal deals. “That’s not noteworthy in the sense that there’s more succession planning taking place,” he said. “But it’s noteworthy because most of these that we’re seeing are not supporting a partner retiring, and younger gen-two, gen-three folks buying them out. That happens too, but that’s separate. These are just straight-up purchases, buying into a firm that these advisors are working at and it’s happening a material amount of the time where we want to take note of it and share that with you today.”  To read the full article, please visit: https://www.financial-planning.com/news/how-m-a-is-rewarding-top-financial-advisor-talent  Disclaimer This article was first published by Tobias Salinger The original article can be found here. All rights to the original content are held by FinancialPlanning.com.

Everything You Need To Understand Liquidation Rights

Liquidation rights, also known as liquidation preferences, are a key element in contract negotiations for mergers and acquisitions. They determine who gets paid and when should a company choose to sell or liquidate all its assets. With a merger, liquidation rights can be leveraged in the deal once the buyer figures out the breakdown of existing parties who need to get paid. For acquisitions, it’s all about properly allocating preferred stock and liquidation preferences to investors. Liquidation Rights and Organizational Hierarchy When a corporation is formed, it’s up to the board of directors to set up a stock structure that should include executive, preferred, and common stock. Each category awards the recipient with a certain number of votes per share and a place in the liquidation queue. If venture capital is used for start-up money, the venture capital firm will typically insist that they be the first to get paid in the event of liquidation or sale of the company, ahead of debt holders or other preferred stockholders. Common stockholders get paid last. Liquidation rights also come into play in the event of a bankruptcy. In this case, as in the case of a general liquidation or sale, a company liquidator needs to unwind the complexities of secured and unsecured debt, investor liquidation preferences, and preferred stockholder allocations. It’s important to understand that the organizational hierarchy of liquidation rights can be very different from the executive or even board hierarchy of the company itself. General employees are typically issued common stock and can walk away with nothing in certain scenarios. Liquidation Preference is a Key Element in M&A Deals Researching liquidation rights should be part of the due diligence process for any merger or acquisition. When there’s a change in ownership, certain obligations need to be attended to. Among those, there could be unresolved debt or repayments to investors. This is one of those areas that bringing in an experienced MA consultant will pay dividends for you. In most cases, it’s the seller’s responsibility to meet repayment of debt obligations before closing the deal, but the buyer may inherit some of those liabilities if they are not careful. Companies only need to sell 51% of their equity shares to transfer control to another business or private entity. The remaining shareholders keep their shares, some of which may be preferred stock that holds a liquidation preference. Your legal team needs to evaluate that. Liquidation Rights for Preferred Stockholders Issuing preferred stock to select investors or partners in the firm is not a guarantee of payment in the event of a sale or liquidation. It does, however, put them closer to the front of the line. Keep that in mind when structuring an acquisition contract. To ensure liquidation rights are clearly defined, it is recommended that you utilize different classes of preferred stock. Callable shares, which can be bought out by the company prior to the next acquisition or merger, are a sensible option if investors will go for it. Convertible preferred shares can be an attractive option also, and a good negotiating tool. They can be traded for common stock using a predetermined multiplier. Issuing these as part of an acquisition strategy can be a tradeoff for guaranteeing liquidation rights. Classes of preferred stock to avoid when drafting an MA contract are participatory preferred shares and cumulative preferred shares. They each offer dividend guarantees, which can be a slippery slope. There are better ways to ensure major investors make a profit. Liquidation Rights for Common Stockholders Holders of common stock only benefit from liquidation rights when the acquisition price exceeds the sum of the guarantees made to preferred stockholders and any debt payments that need to be made before the deal can be closed. Like preferred stock, common stock can be allocated into different classes, and liquidation rights can be assigned based on those classes. This is also how voting rights are awarded. When acquiring a new company, creating these classes is your responsibility. When assigning common stock to employees, make sure there’s a reasonable vetting schedule in place to protect the company. If things don’t go well in the first few years and you have to sell, this will eliminate any liquidation rights for common stockholders. Liquidation Preference for Founders with Capital Investment A founder investing his or her own money into a company is not the same as a venture capital firm making an investment. Founders don’t have a special liquidation preference. They’re treated the same as any other preferred stockholder. To alleviate concern over this, companies can create an “executive” class of preferred stock that has better voting rights and is higher up the chain for liquidation preference. This will usually guarantee some compensation after venture capital firms are paid. Liquidation Rules for Creditors and Debt Holders In cases of insolvency, there are rules for paying off creditors when a liquidation occurs. These don’t have to be included in an MA contract, but this list should be used when negotiating a purchase or sale. The following debts should be paid off in this order. Secured Creditors with a Fixed Charge Preferential Creditors Secured Creditors with a Floating Charge Unsecured Creditors Fixed charges are assets used to secure a loan that have a fixed value, such as property or equipment. An example of a floating charge is stock, which fluctuates (floats) in value, but fixes on the liquidation date. Unsecured loans have no collateral attached and can be saved for last.

Should Financial Advisors List Their Practice? The Truth Behind RIA Practice Listings

The Truth About Listing a Financial Advisory or RIA Practice — And Why It’s a Strategic Advantage, Not a Weakness. For many financial advisors and RIA owners, the idea of “listing” their practice triggers an immediate sense of resistance. It can feel public, vulnerable, and even risky. Some envision a Craigslist-style listing that signals desperation. Others fear clients or staff discovering the news prematurely. And nearly every advisor has heard some version of the belief that good practices don’t need listings — the right buyer will just appear. These assumptions have created one of the most pervasive misconceptions in the financial advisory industry. Yet, as SRG’s extensive experience shows, listing your practice is not a last resort — it’s a leadership decision. A strategic accelerator. A valuation maximizer. A risk-reducing mechanism. In today’s competitive advisory marketplace, listing a practice confidentially and professionally is one of the most effective ways to uncover qualified buyers, increase value, and protect clients. Let’s break down the real truth behind the myth. Why the Myth Exists in the Financial Advisor & RIA Space 1. Misunderstanding What “Listing” Actually Means Many advisors imagine a public posting revealing: their name their AUM their client list their revenue their intent to exit In reality, professional listings (like those SRG facilitates) are private, controlled, gated, and fully confidential. Are You Ready to Exit? Download SRG’s Seller Readiness eBook Selling your business can seem like a daunting task. Our Seller Readiness E-Book identifies crucial elements for you to think about as you begin the process of finding your successor. 2. Fear of Optics Financial advisors and RIA owners often pride themselves on stability, trust, and continuity. They fear that listing creates the perception of instability. 3. Desire for Simplicity Selling to a colleague or local advisor feels easier — even if it lowers valuation or increases risk. 4. Believing “Good Practices Sell Themselves” This mentality reinforces the idea that a listing is only for advisors struggling to find a buyer. Each of these fears is rooted in emotional instinct — not reality. The Reality: Listing Is One of the Strongest Strategic Moves an Advisor Can Make 1. A listing is confidential, controlled, and entirely seller-driven. A proper advisory practice listing is not public. SRG’s listing process is intentionally designed for discreet, confidential outreach. Nothing is posted publicly. Nothing is shared without a signed NDA. Your name, your client list, your financials, and your intentions are all protected until you decide otherwise. A listing is not a “for sale” sign — it’s a structured, professionally managed expression of interest designed to attract qualified buyers, not curiosity seekers. 2. Listing expands your buyer pool — and competition directly increases value. One of the biggest risks in a sale is limiting yourself to too few candidates. When sellers only talk to their friend, their junior advisor, or a single referral, they drastically reduce competitive tension — which often translates to: lower upfront value less favorable terms weaker client transition support longer seller obligations A listing introduces strategic choice. It brings in candidates you would never meet otherwise — candidates you can compare, interview, and evaluate. It gives you leverage and a clearer understanding of what the market is willing to pay. 3. Listing doesn’t lock you into anything – it gives you optionality Many sellers think that once they list, they’ve “started the clock” or agreed to sell. Not true. Listing simply opens the door. You can: proceed delay pause or walk away entirely You control the pace. You control the communication. You choose when — or if — you accept any offer. A listing is optionality, not commitment. 4. Listing allows SRG to screen out 90% of unqualified, unprepared, and unaligned buyers. Without a structured process, sellers are forced to field calls from anyone with a passing interest — tire-kickers, undercapitalized advisors, mismatched cultures, and buyers who lack financing. With SRG managing the listing, you never deal with: buyers who don’t meet financial requirements advisors who only want the “top 20% of your book” competitors fishing for information firms with no capacity for transition management This prevents wasted time, misalignment, and unnecessary exposure. 5. Listing allows you to shape the narrative, not react to it. When you proactively list with a structured process, you become the pilot — not the passenger. You determine: How buyers perceive your practice How clients are introduced How staff is prepared How your brand and legacy are represented What strengths are highlighted What risks are managed Without a listing, buyers create their own narrative — usually based on incomplete or inaccurate assumptions. Listing is how you take control of your story. 6. A listing is a sign of good business ownership – not desperation Strategic buyers respond best to strategic sellers. Listings demonstrate that you are intentional, organized, committed to continuity, financially informed, and proactive. This increases confidence –  which increases deal quality. 7. A Well-Crafted Listing Attracts Sophisticated Buyers A high-quality listing is not a generic advertisement. SRG creates a professionally structured profile backed by: Certified valuation Financial review Client demographic analysis Transition planning strategy Risk-adjusted value modeling Deal structure guidance This positions your practice as a premium opportunity, not an anonymous listing. In fact, many of the highest-value sales SRG has executed in the past decade started with a listing — because listings generate healthy competition that private conversations cannot. Conclusion: Listing Is Not a Sign of Weakness — It’s a Sign of Intentional Leadership Advisors don’t list because they’re weak. They list because they are: Strategic Responsible business owners who plan rather than react protective of their clients committed to a good transition honoring their family’s financial future protecting the legacy of their firm – including the employees who helped build it maximizing value reducing risk taking control of their exit A listing is not an exit — it’s the beginning of a well-managed, thoughtful, confidential exploration of your options. Used correctly, it positions sellers for the strongest valuation, best buyer, and smoothest

RIA Leaders: Top 10 firms by number of financial advisors for 2025

By: Tobias SalingerPublishing Date: November 25, 2025  Whether or not publicly traded wealth management firms disclose their headcounts of financial advisors in their quarterly earnings, the number represents a closely watched industry metric. So the below rankings of fee-only registered investment advisory firms with the most advisors in Financial Planning’s annual RIA Leaders study reveal which companies are hiring and training at the largest volume. Executives that have led giant wealth management firms such as Ameriprise, Wells Fargo Advisors, Morgan Stanley and Merrill to remove their quarterly headcount figures frequently argue that the number of advisors is no longer as important as the amount of client assets, organic growth, productivity or, of course, revenue and profit.  On the other hand, advisor headcount affects each of those other figures. And the firm with more advisors than any other, LPL Financial, proudly shared the size of its ranks of 32,128 advisors at the end of the third quarter. Fee-only RIAs such as Savant Wealth Management, Moneta Group Investment Advisors and EP Wealth Advisors don’t approach that level of scale. However, they’re operating in a field with a stagnant overall headcount of advisors, a massive succession challenge amid looming retirements and a possible hiring shortfall in the face of growing consumer demand for advice.  Technology may solve part of those problems, said David Grau, the CEO of consulting firm Succession Resource Group. He compared the potential of technology like artificial intelligence to the difference between moving a big pile of wood with or without a wheelbarrow.  While there’s “obviously a need” to hire more advisors, that dearth of incoming talent isn’t “as bad or as out of proportion as we have made it out to be in the past,” due to the AI and other tech, Grau said. To read the full article, please visit:  https://www.financial-planning.com/list/fee-only-rias-with-the-most-financial-advisors-in-2025 Disclaimer This article was first published by Tobias Salinger The original article can be found here. All rights to the original content are held by FinancialPlanning.com.

The RIA founder’s dilemma: Choose your successor or sell

By: Tobias SalingerPublishing Date: November 24, 2025 This is the 28th installment in a Financial Planning series by Chief Correspondent Tobias Salinger on how to build a successful RIA. See the previous stories here, or find them by following Salinger on LinkedIn. Registered investment advisory firm founders who build profitable businesses with a stable base of clients must one day decide how they would like to pick a successor.  With around a third of the industry’s financial advisors expecting to retire in the next decade and a looming potential shortfall of professionals compared to the demand for advice, RIA  successors will either emerge internally or through an acquisition. One path at that fork in the road likely poses a more lucrative exit from the field, but with less autonomy about the transition of clients to a new advisor after selling the firm. The other trail enshrines an advisor’s legacy with those clients under the same company with hand-picked successors. But developing those successors has proven challenging for many firms that are simultaneously fielding higher bids from RIA aggregators. Internal successions equate to a “natural discount of at least 30%” compared to selling to private equity-backed firms and other RIA and advisory team consolidators, said Steven Tenney, a former advisor who is the founder of consulting and RIA coaching firm Grandview & Co. and the author of a new book published earlier this month called, “RIA Succession Alpha.” They also require “empowering the next generation of successors,” so that “the firm starts to run on its own, with less input from the founder,” he noted. After an RIA has created its plan, its one or more owners and their team must work together through the transition. “Without clarity, you’re aimless, and so you’ve got to start there,” Tenney said. “Many people treat succession planning as an event, as opposed to a necessary part of business. There is near-perfect overlap between succession planning and good business planning. It’s one and the same.” To read the full article, please visit:  https://www.financial-planning.com/news/how-to-hire-and-advance-an-ria-successor Disclaimer This article was first published by Tobias Salinger The original article can be found here. All rights to the original content are held by FinancialPlanning.com.

Building a Lasting Legacy Through Equity Sharing with Brian Cochran

Turning Ownership Into Opportunity For Brian Cochran’s second-generation advisory firm, the path toward long-term success required more than just organic growth; it required intentional career-building for continued legacy and internal succession. After assuming full ownership of the business, the firm’s new leader recognized a critical opportunity: transform equity participation from a future concept into a tangible, motivating force for key team members. Although Brian’s firm already had a robust benefits structure, its principal understood that true retention goes beyond compensation. The next step was to create a deeper sense of belonging and shared purpose. The challenge wasn’t just deciding if to share equity — it was determining how to do it in a way that aligned with his vision for the firm. The owner knew that opening the door to ownership could be transformative, but it also carried risks. The firm wanted to reward and retain high performers without compromising financial stability or creating future complications. Among the key questions they faced: Timing plays a key role in shaping both value and price. A valuation is a recurring tool that helps you plan proactively—identifying opportunities to strengthen your business and enhance value before you need to act. In contrast, price happens once, when your firm, finances, and personal goals are all aligned and ready for transition. Recognizing that the stakes were high, the firm sought expert guidance to design a plan that would balance growth, fairness, and sustainability. The Turning Point: Choosing Succession Resource Group Brian Cochran turned to SRG’s Equity Sharing team, led by Julia Sexton, CVA®, Director of Strategic Organization Planning. The decision to partner with SRG was rooted in one defining principle: expertise matters. What impressed Brian most was SRG’s ability to ask the right questions. Rather than offering prepackaged solutions, SRG invested the time to deeply understand the firm’s structure, team culture, and long-term vision. Each conversation helped Brian’s firm refine its objectives and uncover what truly made his practice unique. The Discovery Process: Defining the Dual Goals As the project unfolded, SRG helped Brian Cochran articulate two distinct yet complementary goals: The Strategy Through deep discussion and scenario modeling, SRG helped Brian’s firm recognize that these objectives could be met through a two-part strategy. This flexible dual-plan design enabled Brian’s firm to reward both tenure and potential, ensuring that no key contributor was left out of the long-term vision. The Solution: Designing a Balanced and Sustainable Plan Led by Julia Sexton, CVA®, Director of Strategic Organization Planning, SRG developed a personalized plan that aligned with the firm’s culture and goals. The resulting Equity Sharing Plan provided a balanced framework that: Key Features of the Plan Implementation: A Seamless Process with Expert Guidance One of Brian’s early concerns was how complex and intimidating the process might be. SRG’s structured, hands-on approach quickly alleviated those fears. SRG coordinated directly with the firm’s tax advisor, ensuring alignment at every stage. They clearly explained each option, its implications, and its benefits, translating technical and legal details into actionable insights. From a legal and administrative perspective, SRG’s diligence and communication created peace of mind. Nothing fell through the cracks, and every step built confidence in the final outcome. The Rollout: Bringing the Team On Board Once the plan was finalized, the firm turned its attention to rollout and communication, a critical step in ensuring understanding and enthusiasm with the team. SRG equipped Brian Cochran with the necessary tools, talking points, and documentation to facilitate one-on-one conversations with eligible team members. These personalized discussions helped participants understand: The Client’s Reflection: Confidence in the Future Reflecting on the process, Brian Cochran expressed deep satisfaction with the results and gratitude for SRG’s partnership. The success of the plan reinforced a broader insight: succession and equity planning aren’t just about ownership, they’re about creating a culture of shared success. The Takeaway: Partnership That Builds the Future This case exemplifies SRG’s mission to help advisors, RIAs, and other financial firms align their people, purpose, and planning for enduring success. Through the thoughtful leadership of Julia Sexton CVA®, Brian Cochran gained not just a plan but a strategic framework for growth, retention, and value-building initiatives. The Equity Sharing Plan now serves as both a meaningful reward system and career-building roadmap, ensuring that the firm’s brightest talent can build their future within the organization. Download the Case Study Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form. Name * FirstLast Phone Work Email *How Did You Hear About SRG? *— Select Choice —ConferenceDirect MailExisting/Past ClientGoogle AdWordsOtherReferralSocial MediaSeminar/WorkshopWebinarWebsite Download

Employment Agreements: The 10 Most Commonly Asked Questions

Overview This resource is designed to help financial services business owners navigate one of the most important, but often overlooked, aspects of running a firm: employment agreements. In this practical FAQ guide, SRG answers the ten most common questions about creating, implementing, and maintaining Employee and Contractor Agreements, drawing on decades of industry-specific experience. You’ll learn the key benefits of written agreements, how to avoid worker misclassification, how often agreements should be updated, and how to structure them to protect your firm while supporting staff growth. The guide also covers best practices for incorporating compensation terms, equity grants, non-solicitation provisions, and role descriptions, ensuring compliance and clarity for both employers and employees Created by SRG’s Director of Strategic Organizational Planning, Julia Sexton, CVA®, this guide distills years of hands-on experience helping firms design agreements that retain top talent, minimize risk, and safeguard long-term business value. DOWNLOAD NOW

Contingency Agreement Types: Protect What Matters Most

Secure Continuity, No Matter What. Overview Contingency planning at SRG is a proactive service designed for business owners who want to (and should want to) protect their firm and clients in the event of a triggering event (e.g., death, disability, or incapacity). These services help ensure business continuity by creating a customized transition or sale plan that outlines what will happen and who will take over. At Succession Resource Group, our team helps you choose the key features and details of a contingency plan to create a realistic and achievable contingency plan for your team, clients, and family, as well as the most appropriate type of agreement to achieve your unique goals. This article explains what contingency agreements you might consider implementing. Most Common Agreement Types Buy-Sell Agreement (One Way) Nature: A contractual obligation to purchase / sell upon a triggering event (e.g., death, disability, or incapacity). The contingency agreement itself does not represent the purchase / sale documentation; however, it defines who, when, at what price, and what terms the purchase will occur. Purpose: Ensures commitment and prioritization without finalizing a sale. Best For: Business owners who want a transition plan to protect their clients and business value with minimal disruption, and who have a willing buyer to name in such an agreement. Reciprocal Buy-Sell Agreement Nature: A mutual agreement where two firms (or individuals) agree to buy each other’s business if a triggering event (e.g., death, disability, or incapacity) occurs in either. Purpose: Provides peace of mind and shared protection between similarly situated firms. Reciprocal buy-sell agreements ensure commitment and prioritization without finalizing a sale. Best For: Business owners who have a mutual agreement to the terms of a transition plan to protect their clients and business value with minimal disruption. Retainer Agreement Nature: A service arrangement between the business owner(s) and Succession Resource Group (SRG), where SRG is contractually obligated to find a suitable buyer in the event of a triggering event (e.g., death, disability, or incapacity) to purchase your business. Purpose: Provides peace of mind to business owners who don’t have a contingency partner identified, but want to ensure their clients and business will be protected with minimal disruption. Best For: Business owners who want a backup plan with minimal disruption but don’t have a willing buyer to name in such a plan.